University endowments – Giving # 2

“If a rich man is proud of his wealth, he should not be praised until it is known how he employs it.”

— Socrates

This is follow-up to my earlier post “Giving.”

On a recent day of sailing, my friend and host conveyed that he too had doubts about donating to rich universities.  Although he has given to Stanford over the years, he was now questioning that practice.  I pointed him to my recent blog post on giving.  He helpfully found an error, now corrected.  He also conveyed “your metrics of $/student and $/annual budget are very informative.  They both are much better measures of the size of an endowment than absolute dollars.”

This encouraged me to create the following table for the top universities in the U.S. as ranked by US News and World Report. (In it I’ve dubbed the ratio of Endowment/Annual Expenses the “Jake Ratio” and sorted the data on that variable.)


Observations:
1) The top ranked large universities have large endowments.
2) When normalized by student count or annual expenses, Princeton has the largest endowment.
3) With a Jake Ratio of over 11, Princeton can stay in business for a decade or more without any revenues!

Posted in Best Practices, Non-profits | Leave a comment

Note #2 to a good friend on investing

“Out of intense complexities, intense simplicities emerge”

― Winston Churchill

Dear GF,

I trust you’ve clicked on the links in my last post to learn more about risk and investment portfolios, advisor fees, and picking stocks.  There is a very substantial body of literature on these subjects – relevant articles, books, and papers range from those written for a layperson to those intended for an academic audience, so there is lots more to read.  If you’re so inclined….

Assuming you’re on board with my earlier post and what’s expressed in the linked articles, we can summarize the approach you should take as follows:  Diversify, keep expenses low, and create your portfolio with a sharp eye for your tolerance for risk.

OK.  To diversify, one can purchase mutual funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs).  There are thousands of these to choose from, funds for virtually any investment category.  My advice is to Go Big – that will be the simplest and easiest way to achieve diversification, subject to the vehicle having low costs.  Fortunately,  a well known vendor, Vanguard, has several mutual funds and related ETFs that are both large and inexpensive for their categories, such as VT, VTI, VWO, and others.

Second, to keep expenses low, select low cost vehicles (such as Vanguard ETFs), and go with inexpensive advisory services.  The lowest cost approach to advisory services is of course to do it yourself with no fee to a third party.  If you are not comfortable with that, there is a large menu of service providers:  personalized service at 1-2%/yr. on assets managed as well as Internet based services from around 1%/yr. down to a fixed fee of a few dollars/mo. for small accounts with very limited advisory services.

Your ability to tolerate risk goes hand in hand with the returns you’re likely to achieve over the long run.  More risk = higher expected return.  In the context of an investment portfolio, equities are riskier than fixed income instruments or cash, and this mix deserves your careful attention.

You asked that I recommend what you should do and that I suggest what service providers to use.  (I advise against and assume you do not wish to pay the 1-2%/year that a high-service advisor will charge, mostly for what amounts to handholding.)  For a lower fee structure and lower service level there are a number of cloud-based providers.  Most are relatively new, pre-profit, often backed by venture capitalists, and have unproven business models.  The exception is Financial Engines, which was co-founded in 1996 by Professor William F. Sharpe, a recipient of the 1990 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his pioneering work on the theory of financial economics, including how prices of financial assets are determined and the link between risk and return.

I was fortunate to be a student of Professor Sharpe at Stanford, and have always respected his exceptional mind and fact-based, follow the evidence approach.  I’m confident his thinking and personality have permeated Financial Engines and that they provide a quality service.  And, fortunately, their service is very reasonably priced at $300/year.  (Better yet, some fund companies such as Vanguard, waive the Financial Engines fee in certain circumstances.)

So, there you have it: engage Financial Engines.  Go through their process to gain insights on your ability to tolerate risk and what that implies for your portfolio.  I understand that the process will eventually yield recommendations as to your portfolio mix and specific instruments.

Thank you for asking for my advice and offering the chance to express myself!

Your friend, Krist

P.S. By the way, an excellent site for additional information on low cost investing is http://Bogleheads.org.

Posted in Best Practices, Investing | Leave a comment

Note to a friend on investing

“For I don’t care too much for money, For money can’t buy me love.”  (John Lennon & Paul McCartney, 1964)

To my Good Friend,

You asked for a brief summary of my advice as you develop your plan for redeploying your liquid assets.  This is because you’re not comfortable doing it on your own and you haven’t yet engaged a for-pay financial advisor, investment consultant, or online service provider.

You’re not a large risk taker and, except for an old IRA, you’ve kept your savings in a money market fund and bank account.  As you’re well aware, for several years the yields on these accounts have been near zero, just a small fraction of what you grew accustomed to until late 2008.  So, you’re getting more comfortable with the concept of moving savings into assets with higher return potential such as equities and fixed income instruments.  These of course are more risky than cash, at least in the sense they could go down in  nominal value.  (Sidebar: Cash isn’t without risk in a bull market or inflationary environment).

Several of your friends have engaged professional financial advisors and I understand you’re considering that route.  If you were to engage such an advisor, he/she’d consider your age, health, income, resources, plans, risk tolerance, need for liquidity, tax situation, other assets, etc.  The goal would be to develop a good understanding of you and your situation.  With that knowledge, she would suggest feasible allocations for asset classes (cash, stocks, bonds, real estate, other real assets including gold, commodities, collectables, etc.).  It is likely she’d suggest the majority of your investable assets be allocated to a portfolio containing a mix of fixed income instruments (bonds) and stocks. Through a collaborative process with your advisor, you would in all likelihood choose a target allocation between the broad categories of stocks and bonds (such as 55% and 45%) and then to categories within each broad category (domestic large capitalization (“cap”) stocks, emerging market stocks, Treasury bonds, etc. etc.)  For a good discussion of this, see Vanguard’s framework for constructing diversified portfolios.

For the advice of a professional financial consultant or investment advisor, you’d be charged a fee.  For “fee only” advisors that you can meet with in person, that fee could be as much as 2%/year on the assets overseen (and, in any event, a meaningful portion of the earnings one could reasonably expect on the asset pool).  (Be aware, there are many variations on fees:  for example, for larger investors, Vanguard and Fidelity each has a menu of services which includes “free” advice; for another approach, one of several cloud-based advisors, Wealthfront, charges 0.25%/year.  There are many, many service providers each with its own menu of fees.)

However, on the concept of investment advisors and fees, keep in mind that many well respected investment professionals believe paying a third party advisory fees is mostly a waste of money.  See, for example,  “Are You Paying Too Much For Investment Help?”   It’s by Burton G. Malkiel, a former professor at Princeton and author of the popular and respected book on investing, “A Random Walk Down Wall Street,” now in its 12th edition.

I could go on and on with details about various financial assets and the landscape of advisory services.  But you asked for a short note, so you could get started thinking.  To that point, based on what I know about you, please consider simplifying your choices by making the following assumptions:

1) You own your home, so you probably have enough real estate.

2) You don’t like volatility and seek to preserve capital, so no need to consider gold and commodities.

3) You like to minimize transaction and holding costs, so stay away from collectables.

In short, my advice:

1) Focus on stocks and bonds (through exchange-traded funds (ETFs), don’t be a stock or bond picker)*.

2) Diversify.

3) Minimize your costs including taxes.

Assuming you follow the advice as sketched out above, you’ll need to consider carefully and decide on the percentage allocation between stocks, bonds, and cash – this is a very key decision for you.  After that, achieving diversification of your stock and bond holdings is more-or-less straightforward with mutual funds and ETFs, some of which are low cost.

In a future note I’ll strive to write you about ETFs and, possibly, cloud based investment management services.

I hope you find this information helpful…let me know of any questions or comments.

Krist

*For example, see “What Stock to Buy?  Hey, Mom, Don’t Ask Me” by N. Gregory Mankiw (Professor of Economics at Harvard).

Posted in Best Practices, Investing | Leave a comment

Giving

“If you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there.”  (Lewis Carroll (1832 – 1898)).  It’s in that spirit that I write this blog…simply a place to express myself on a variety of subjects that will evolve to I don’t know what.

I’ve considered what the subject of the first entry should be.  Something to do with business?  Entrepreneurism?  The ocean?  Exchange Traded Funds?  Wally, my family dog?  And so forth…

The winning choice is to discuss briefly the subject of giving to non-profit organizations such as charities and universities.  The subject is one I’ve given some thought to, and I hope it is or will be important to you.

By way of background, with a major class reunion coming up at the Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB), I’ve been solicited by classmates (twice) within the last couple of months to make a gift to the GSB.  These requests are in addition to the multiple annual boilerplate requests from Stanford itself and, within Stanford, the engineering school.

But in the annals of university fundraising, relative to the institutions’ sizes, Stanford is playing catch up to Princeton, which has pushed the envelope in its processes and successes in developing a large pool of donors.  Although Stanford’s endowment of $17 billion is about the same as Princeton’s, on a per student basis Princeton’s is the country’s largest at $2 million/student, while Stanford’s is “only” $1 million/student.  In a similar vein, Princeton’s endowment is over 11X its annual operating budget, vs. only 4X for Stanford.  (Numbers are approximate.  Student counts include undergraduate & graduate.)

While endowments such as these support current operations to some extent, they continue to grow and the sponsoring university’s management cannot resist the temptation to devote incremental resources to making the savings accounts even larger.

(Sidebar: Given their financial resources, if these universities were publicly held companies, the odds are high they would be hounded by shareholders demanding a dividend or share repurchase.  The fact they have so much cash and outside investments indicates they don’t feel they have good enough investment opportunities in their own lines of business, research and education.  So why do they need more?)

Would a gift to Stanford and/or Princeton be the best use (from society’s point of view) of the dollars I’ve budgeted for charity?  Honestly, I don’t think so.  I say that because I feel the marginal effect of any gift I might make to either of these schools would be truly negligible compared to what the same gift would mean to any of many other charities.

I first started thinking critically about the subject of charitable donations as a volunteer of the San Francisco Ocean Film Festival, a 501(c)(3) non-profit which I co-founded 10 years ago and helped bootstrap.  My interest was further piqued by a 2008 article in the New York Times by a Harvard alum questioning Harvard’s priorities, “Enjoy the Reunion, Skip the Check.”   In re-reading it again, this article continues to impress me.

I’ve done further research.  For example, a thought provoking article on rich universities is by Sarah Waldeck of the Seton Hall School of Law, “The Coming Showdown over University Endowments.”

Finally, philosopher Peter Singer, a Professor of Bioethics at Princeton, is an original thinker who has written and lectured widely on leading an ethical life.  One topic he’s elevated is how to apportion one’s gifts to charities; in 2010 he authored The Life You Can Save: How to Do Your Part to End World Poverty, in which he argues that giving to save lives is the highest form of giving.  He’s had several relevant articles in the New York Times including one last Sunday, Good Charity, Bad Charity.

So, if one is interested in making one’s gifts count, where specifically should they go?  That is obviously a personal question, one only you can answer, and one I urge you to be intelligent about.  Personally, I’ve begun by looking close to home, where the poverty doesn’t quite compare with Africa’s, but the needs are still great (at least relative to Stanford & Princeton!).  One admirable and, I feel, worthy charity with a Bay Area focus is Philanthropic Ventures Foundation.  For gifts further afield, there are websites that suggest worthy charities, and the best such site I’ve found is GiveWell.org.

In the end, your gifts are yours to make.  My suggestion is that you strive to make them count.

Posted in Best Practices, Non-profits | 1 Comment

Hello World!

The plan for this blog is that it be a place where I can publish just about anything I feel may be of wider interest. It’s a bit of an experiment, topics will vary, things will evolve…in the meantime, in the words of a friend, “fair winds.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment